Did you know that the World Health Organization lists formula as only the fourth choice of infant feeding methods? They are, in order; a mother breastfeeding her own baby, another woman wet-nursing the baby, feeding human breastmilk acquired from a milk bank and lastly, formula.
Last October, the FDA said it did not know of any safe level of melamine in baby formula. Then, on November 28, 2008, without any further research, the agency announced that melamine and cyanuric acid are safe in baby formula at levels up to 1 part per million.
Why has the formula not been recalled?
That is the question being asked by Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan. Madigan revealed that the FDA “apparently withheld the results of its testing from the public for over three weeks, and then only disclosed the information in response to a FOIA request by The Associated Press.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/26/AR2008112600386.html?hpid=sec-health
Consumers
http://www.ajc.com/health/content/health/stories/2008/11/28/infant_formula_recall.html
Not to worry though, because on December 3, 2008,” the FDA and WebMD today announced the first-ever partnership between a
http://www.webmd.com/news/20081203/fda-webmd-announce-partnership
Right…
And this will increase consumer confidence in the FDA?
Unfortunately, melamine is not the only problem.
There is a long history of formula being recalled because of manufacturing errors.
http://www.breastfeeding.com/advocacy/advocacy_recalls.html
- black plastic particles being found in some cans of formula
- metal particles in formula cans
- peeling can liners
- cans did not contain the labeled amount of inositol, a nutrient required under 21 CFR section 107.100.
- concentrated infant formula being manufactured with lids intended for ready-to-feed formula. The potential existed for a consumer to follow the lid directions (DO NOT ADD WATER) and not properly dilute the formula prior to feeding.
- contamination with Salmonella.
- adulterateration because it may have been produced under unsanitary conditions whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health. Furthermore, the product appears separated and was been linked with mild gastrointestinal illness.
- contamination with glass particles
More recently, on December 2, 2008, the New Mexico Health Department reported that one baby died and another was hospitalized due to infections caused by different strains of the bacteria Enterobacter sakazakii. Both babies had been fed powdered formula, which the CDC says has been associated with contaminated powdered formula products.
Certain steps can be taken immediately, however, to prevent or mitigate E. sakazakii disease. In a joint conference on infant formula safety in February, 2004, the World Health Organization and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations made the following recommendations:
1) encourage industry partners to develop a range of affordable sterile formula options;2) consider setting an industry standard for Enterobacteriaecae and E. sakazakii in infant formula;
3) inform infant caregivers of the risks associated with nonsterile, powdered formula; and
4) consider feeding high-risk infants sterile formula if they cannot breast-feed. The findings of our case review suggest that all neonates as well as premature infants should be included in this high-risk infant category.< http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol12no08/05-1509.htm
Unfortunately, this information has not been widely disseminated. Even hospital maternity units continue to provide powdered formula for newborns, and so mothers go home with their babies and free samples, believing that it is safe.
http://www.ibreastfeeding.com/Volume%2035.pdf#page=2v
http://www.naba-breastfeeding.org/images/Just%20one.pdf
So why do the stats show an increase in breastfeeding?
Remember, those yearly charts which show how many babies are breastfed are produced by a formula company, Ross Labs. What they do NOT tell you is that the figures include every baby who was ever put to the breast, even once, whether or not there was any transfer of milk. They do not tell you that almost all of the babies that leave the hospital *breastfeeding* are also being bottle-fed formula. Compare this to the National Immunization Survey (
http://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/data/NIS_data/survey_methods.htm
And then we come to the most important question of all.
If formula feeding is so risky, why do hospitals and WIC give babies formula?
Even without the overt risks, there is also the problem of affordability.
On November 25, 2008, a baby in
http://www.examiner.com/x-1022-Orlando-Parenting-Examiner~y2008m12d2-Diluted-formula-nearly-kills-Tampa-baby
This mother said she had no idea that watering down her baby’s feeds would hurt him. Many mothers are not aware that WIC is a SUPPLEMENTARY food program. It was never designed to provide all of the formula that a baby needs, only part of it.
How can we prevent further tragedies?
That is the subject for another column, but here are a few, proven, methods.
We can:
- offer all mothers accurate information and practical help to enable them to get breastfeeding off to a good start
- give teeth to the current laws protecting women’s rights to nurse in public and pump and nurse at work
- ensure a safe, sustainable and affordable supply of formula for mothers who cannot nurse.
See also:
http://children.webmd.com/news/20081126/melamine-in-us-baby-formula
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28000145
http://www2.tbo.com/content/2008/dec/01/011656/authorities-diluting-formula-save-cash-almost-kill/
http://babycafejapan.blogspot.com/2008/09/melamine-and-breastfeeding.html
http://www.nrdc.org/breastmilk/formula.asp
No comments:
Post a Comment